Food insecurity is the state of not having access to enough affordable, nutritious food. It can have many adverse physical and mental effects, including malnutrition, birth defects, and chronic illness.
We measured food insecurity in relation to food deserts. An urban food desert is a place where residents have to drive more than 1 mile to the nearest grocery store, while a rural food desert is one where you have to drive more than 10 miles. Since rural food deserts have higher rates of food insecurity and our dataset is limited, we decided to exclusively focus on rural food deserts for our analysis.
Among the 3,141 counties in the United States, 2,074 of them have at least one food desert. This means that more than 66% of the counties in the nation have limited access to affordable and healthy food.
We investigated if there is a correlation between food insecurity and race and ethnicity by calculating the percentage of each demographic group that lives in a food desert in each state and county. Although there is at least a 10% disparity between different racial and ethnic groups that are facing food insecurity in many states, some areas are significantly worse than others. For example, Hughes County, SD has one of the largest disparities with 100% of the Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander population in a rural food desert, compared to only 2% of the Asian population.
All of this data begs the question, how can we begin tackling this problem? How should areas or populations in the United States be prioritized in the fight against food insecurity?
We explored two common strategies: prioritizing the areas that are the most gravely impacted by food insecurity, and prioritizing the racial and ethnic demographics who are the most vulnerable to food insecurity.
We found that North Dakota and South Dakota have the highest levels of food insecurity in the country, even across different racial and ethnic groups.